The State and Citizen Relationship in Bhutan - a view
Bhutan has
experienced rapid changes politically, socially, economically and culturally since
it became a nation state in the 1600s, thus changing the relation of its
citizens to the state. Thus, a study to understand the exact relationship
between state and citizen becomes fundamental. Often stated by many political
theorists, the state seems to want maximum authority and citizen maximum
liberty. It then becomes the utmost duty of both the state and citizen to
compromise on all issues to strike a balance to bring out harmony and happiness
in the nation.
The Bhutanese have
always been supportive of the state since it became a nation state. This we see
in the protective activities of various external interference even as a young nation
state when the Tibetans launched many attacks. The untrained ‘pazaps’ (militia) would rise from
amongst the farmers in defence of a nationhood they did not even understand.
While the citizens held up the state, the state was also considerate in taking
care of the citizens through the various policies made, be it taxation or
communication.
Interestingly enough,
even when the citizens of this young nation ward off the Tibetan and Mongol
combined forces giving the world a chance to question the Mongol invincibility,
the domestic forces of the Lam Kha Nga offered a more confusing challenge. How
could the citizens fight their own people?
Would it question their integrity and unity? But only when the Lam Kha Nga
attacked in coalition with the Tibetans, did the citizens realize and
recognize their nation state.
Though at times rough
and baffled, the state was the citizen and the citizen the state. The vacant
seat of the authority in Bhutan in 1705 left the Bhutanese in a state of
confusion and struggle. But the people of Bhutan came together once more to
fight off the British (Duar Wars) and replaced the Choesi-Nyiden system with a more stable
system of governance then – Monarchy. This time they even ensured who was to
succeed to avoid any discrepancy later on by confirming it as a hereditary
Monarchy system of governance.
Despite the
absolutism in the monarchy and the centralization of the government and certain
heavy taxes they had to pay, the citizens saw the need to support the state
that provided them peace after many years of instability. More peace and
happiness was brought about by Druk
Gyalpo Jigme Dorji Wangchuck, when he abolished serfdom and ended the age
old policy of absolutism and isolation. Never has any state been so considerate
when it came to ‘freedom’ of the citizen as did this one. The people now
enjoyed more privileges giving them all reasons to support the state.
With the enthronement
of Druk Gyalpo Jigme Singye
Wangchuck, the Bhutanese entered into an era of happiness through the many
goals designed by the far-sighted king – self-reliance, sustainability and
Gross National Happiness. The Bhutanese now played a greater role in designing
the modern nation state of Bhutan. The gift of a vote, representations at the
National Assembly and the Constitution has made the Bhutanese citizen more
responsible for the development of the young democracy. People – young and old,
men and women, now play a very important role in bringing about policies that affect
the development of the state and life of the citizens.
However, the state
has received a lot of criticism in history and even today. There were times
when the citizen had limited liberty and could never raise any issue. Fear
defined many policies and the citizen would bear the burden in silence. But the
Bhutanese never faced any chaos and disorder between the state and the citizen.
Could the silence, perhaps, be due to the short lived “harsh” policies of the
state and the citizen’s understanding of the need for peace? The Bhutanese state
and citizen have always worked to strike a balance on their needs. Culture and
the tradition that the Bhutanese have been brought up on, most probably, plays
the most important role in defining the relationship. While benevolent leaders
have always tried to educate the people about their rights and responsibilities,
the basic Bhutanese courtesy of acceptance and their relaxed attitude have kept
commotions at bay, fortifying the relationship. Plans and policies have been
taken to the “gewogs” and people encouraged
in making their own decisions.
While many views and
ideologies have changed since the introduction of democracy in 2008, the
Bhutanese still remain loyalists. After the institution of a Democratic
Constitutional Monarchy in 2008, people have become more vocal about their
needs and the state has become a little authoritative. Is it the suppressed
silence or excitement about the new idea of liberty? Or is it the longing for
the benevolent leaders as opposed to the new commands? Perhaps it is the modern
day awareness that has brought about an understanding of the power of the
citizen – that one vote! Or better still, it is development planned by our benevolent
leaders that has educated almost all Bhutanese to create a nation that lives
content in harmony and happily.
Whatever the reasons,
this small country has always been successful in resolving its differences with
maturity, through peace. The nation has lived through hard times to prove that
Gross National Happiness is not just a theory. Bhutan has solved matters as any
‘family’ solves their problems – with much care and affection. The Bhutanese
have always been sensible and sensitive about preservation of its uniqueness.
The state and the citizens have always struck a balance to work together
towards peace and harmony. Based on the accomplishments up until now, one can
see a future where the citizens live content lives protected and cared for by
the state.
It is interesting to
note after much thought that the Bhutanese nation state, since 1958, has been
giving to the citizens what the citizens reluctantly took. The third Druk
Gyalpo abolishing serfdom and giving people representation in the newly created
National Assembly giving the citizens a right to vote the Monarch out if they
lost confidence in him is a wonderful example. The gift of democracy to the
citizens by the Great Fourth needs no words of expression. Thus, my definition
for the relation of the Bhutanese State and Citizen would be logically stated
as being very “protective of each other bound with the utmost harmony ensuring
everlasting peace and happiness”.
"... we don't have to buy a range rover even if we have the money", states a friend. I would say "so true". I guess we need humility to get by and better still, if we live by it moderately.
ReplyDelete